![]() For months and months we’ve been focused solely on the mechanics of building a platform — API design, writing tests, fixing bugs, use cases, features, documentation etc — and with the release of the beta the #1 question on everyone’s mind is, “Is JavaFX 2.0 cross platform?!”. That the beta is initially a windows-only beta has apparently stirred up a fair amount of concern. Beta build 30.download javafx 2.0 beta sdk build 32 for microsoft.i recommend that. Have been.download javafx 2.0 beta sdk build 32 for microsoft windows x64. Jan 22, 2006 The Microsoft.NET Framework version 2.0 (x64). Both the 64-bit and 32-bit runtime in one. Framework version 2.0 Software Development Kit. Shockingly, some people have even asked whether we ever intend to be cross platform. I can say definitively “Yes, of course!”. It would be quite illogical for any platform released by the Java team to not be cross platform. And even more so for the Java team to release a platform which had no intention of being cross platform while also purporting that the said platform was to be the next generation Java rich client platform. We absolutely will be targeting a whole host of different platforms, not even just the big three (Mac, Linux, Windows). The value of the Java platform is in the fact that you can write across multiple operating systems and devices. Now, somewhat like Apple, Oracle doesn’t tend to make premature announcements. I cannot at this time comment on when support for different platforms will be available, but hope to comment when such announcements have been made through the official channels. I know that this form of communication strategy leaves people to their own imagination which, as often as not, seems to be rather pessimistic in nature:-). So, to help provide some guidance here, I’d just like to say: JavaFX will be cross platform. I find it problematic to release a cross-platform toolkit without a cross-platform implementation. Remember good old AWT in the pre-Swing days? It was meant to be cross-platform, but there were so many little gotchas, particularly when it came to event handling, that writing a cross-platform application was very hard. If I want a Windows solution, I’ll just use the Microsoft tools–they are hard to beat for that platform. If I want a cross-platform desktop solution, I want to evaluate it on Windows, Mac, Linux, to see if it really is what it claims to be. Cross-platform isn’t something that can be applied after the Windows version works. I am particularly concerned about media, and I am not getting a warm and fuzzy feeling when I read that JavaFX will just use the media playback that’s available on a given platform. That’s AWT think, and it’s not going to work. Cay, I have to agree! Which is why we have not developed a windows version in isolation of everything else — or even first! The Windows SDK for Windows 10 contains. QFE Build: 10.0.16299.91. Make sure you install the latest recommended updates and patches from Microsoft Update before. 15 JDK Installation for Microsoft Windows. If you were downloading the JDK installer for 32-bit systems for update. Oracle JavaFX 2.0 SDK on 64-bit operating. I develop only on a Mac, and have done so for the past 3 years. As many developers here work on Mac as work on Windows, and a number are on Linux. Gerard Ziemski, who designed the initial version of Glass (our windowing layer replacing AWT) works only on a Mac and writes and maintains the Cocoa code. The first platform Glass came up on was a Mac, and was subsequently ported on Windows (and differences between Mac and Windows were at that time worked through). The guys working on the windows version are also the AWT maintainers who for years have wanted another go at it to fix the problems of AWT. We’re really very well versed in these problems:-). As for media, it sounds like there is some documentation which needs addressing. We are using gstreamer for the media framework, which as I’m sure you are aware is really quite widely adopted and works well on multiple platforms. Now, I’m not prepared to make a statement on timetables or on why the windows 32-bit is the only one released at this first beta. Actual results: drivers/rtc/hctosys.c: unable to open rtc device (rtc0) Expected results: No error and no such obvious results regarding ntp. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are changing the version of this bug to '8'. Unable to open rtc device. Bug Zapper 2008-04-04 09:44:09 EDT Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported during the development of Fedora 8. If this bug still exists in rawhide, please change the version back to rawhide. But do bear in mind, we’re releasing a new beta build every 2 weeks. This isn’t a release candidate! It is a snapshot in time which represents a certain level of development and a certain level of testing. I totally agree with most comments posted here. I mean, we hear you, Richard, thank you for your explanations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |